These are a bunch of poorly defined tools I'd like to use. There are probably many reasons why they would be hard to build, or are ill-considered. Enter at your own peril.
or: email but actually good.
or: Signal but slow.
There are two sides to the benefits of email:
1 is hard to make happen out the gate so let's focus on 2.
Crucially email is asynchronous. Thee is a disconnect between sending and receiving and a cultural expectation that messages are not to be immediately replied to.
(You could probably do this on gitlab itself, but it would be a neater as a standalone, specific, tool)
Gitlab orchestrates the entire pipeline for software development. What if you made a similar service but for creative production?
Threads are a very useful social primitive. On twitter, reddit, etc, they form the basis for valuable and complex social interaction. However, there are places all over the internet where it would be useful to have threads, without the weight of an entire social network. Things like cross-site blog chains. Comments on your blog posts. Or even just quick collections of links.
There are a lot of IPFS gateways out there right now, but they all have the URL as a specific page, or query, on the root domain.
This isn't a problem in most cases, but it does become an issue when using IPFS to host client side apps. You'd want to do this for a couple reasons.
You can get around this by instead storing the has as a subdomain on the root,
i.e instead of
https://example.com/HASH you would have
https://HASH.example.com. You could do this with something like zeit's
Less Google Docs, more hackmd.
A tiny site that let's you spin up a collaborative session to make music with anyone who has the link. It should basically just consist of layering sound files, and maybe snapping them to tempo. No Effects, no notes, just placing tracks around. Oh and a way to record input. Bonus points for version control. I think you could also get a lot of mileage out of sample groups. i.e having a snare sample, and then being able to have multiple versions of it easily accessible.
Most calendars are built for either individuals or tightly coordinated groups. I'd like one made for loose communities where people have many divergent purposes. It needs to allow the creation of events by anyone (with some constraints/permissioning) and the easy filtering and discovery of events.
Git is a perfect way to combine changes to a codebase overtime with documention of those changes. If the changes are the progressive, pedagogical, implementation of a project, git becomes a tool for creating tutorials.
I want a static-site generator to then take a git repository and render a nice looking website, combining changes with the commit messages associated with them.
These tutorial do a similar thing:
I'd like to a mobile app the let people create time based rituals. Whether it's something like writing for a set amount of time everyday, or alternatng working and breaks for an hour. Or meditating in a particular structure. It would allow you to set time intervals and would buzz when they occur. Maybe, it would ask for inputs. While a ritual is going on the phone should be unable to be used, and if the app is exited the ritual ends.
Bonus feature: allow multiple people to participate in a ritual by scanning a QR code.
During my term at the Recurse Center, one of the projects I brielfy explored was an Oulipean Linter. The idea was that you could have a git repository that only accepted pul requests that added writing that met certain creative constraints. Things like not using the letter e, or such.
I'd like something like that, but as integrated into my writing environment as my typechecker. Then, I want to be able to edit and create my own constraints, using a simple API, and have them instantly applied to what I'm writing.